The Client

A fast-growing FinTech with 250 people and a sales stack that hadn't kept up

FNT
North American FinTech Company
Identity withheld — engagement details shared with permission
IndustryFinancial Technology (B2B SaaS — subscription-based financial reporting)
RegionUnited States, North America (Connecticut HQ)
Team Size~250 employees, 20+ person sales team
VolumeSMB-focused; 500+ active leads in Salesforce at time of audit
Stack BeforeSalesforce Sales Cloud (underutilised), Outreach (disconnected), spreadsheet lead lists
Engagement TypeEnd-to-end implementation: audit, integration, automation, enablement

By the time they engaged us, this FinTech company had all the right tools in theory — Salesforce, Outreach, a prospecting subscription — but none of them were talking to each other in a meaningful way. Reps were pulling contact lists from spreadsheets, running sequences in Outreach without those activities ever writing back to Salesforce, and manually deciding which leads to prioritise based on gut feel rather than data. The result was a sales team that was working hard but operating at well below its potential.

Their mission — giving small and mid-sized businesses real-time financial insights and automated reporting — was genuinely differentiated. The market opportunity was there. What was missing was a Salesforce CPQ-backed revenue engine that could turn inbound and outbound interest into predictable, measurable pipeline. We'd seen this pattern before across our US SaaS and FinTech engagements — good product, broken commercial infrastructure.


The Problem

Three operational gaps directly costing pipeline and rep productivity

The diagnostic audit in Phase 1 surfaced three interconnected failure modes. Each was costing the team time and revenue independently — together, they were compounding into a serious drag on growth.

01

Inefficient prospecting eating rep time

Sales reps were spending 2–3 hours per day on manual lead research — searching LinkedIn, cross-referencing company websites, and manually entering data into Salesforce. There was no automated enrichment, no consistent segmentation, and no way to identify which prospects matched their ICP without doing the research from scratch. Low-priority prospects consumed as much rep time as high-value accounts because there was nothing to distinguish them at the top of the funnel.

02

Engagement data scattered across disconnected platforms

Outreach was running sequences and capturing email opens, clicks, and reply data — but none of that was writing back to Salesforce in any structured way. Sales managers couldn't see sequence performance alongside pipeline stage, so forecasting was based on opportunity fields that reps updated manually and inconsistently. Reporting could take 2–4 days of data wrangling before a reliable number reached leadership for a weekly review.

03

Manual lead scoring with no routing logic

Leads coming into Salesforce had no scoring model applied. Reps either cherry-picked familiar names or worked through the list top to bottom regardless of signal quality. There were no weighted parameters, no intent-based triggers, and no automated routing rules to direct high-value inbound to the right rep quickly. Follow-up delays of 24+ hours were common on leads that, with proper scoring, would have been flagged for immediate outreach.

04

No unified view for pipeline management or executive reporting

With data living in Salesforce, Outreach, Apollo.io trial data, and spreadsheets simultaneously, there was no single dashboard that told the full story of pipeline health. Managers made decisions based on partial information. Forecasting accuracy suffered because the system of record (Salesforce) was always behind what was actually happening in sequence tools and manual logs.


The Solution

How We Structured the Engagement

We approached this the same way we've approached similar Salesforce CPQ and sales operations engagements for US-based SaaS and FinTech clients — workflow first, configuration second. Before we touched a single Salesforce field or wrote a Zapier workflow, we needed to understand exactly where the process broke down and why the existing tools were underperforming.

The engagement was structured across three phases: a diagnostic audit, a hands-on implementation sprint, and a refinement-and-enablement close. For this FinTech client, the full engagement ran approximately 10 weeks from kickoff to handover.

Engagement Overview
3 phases · ~10 weeks · Salesforce CPQ + Outreach + Apollo.io + LinkedIn + Zapier
Phase 01 — Diagnostic Audit Phase 02 — Implementation & Automation Phase 03 — Refinement & Enablement
PHASE 01

Diagnostic Audit — map the real bottlenecks before touching the tools

Salesforce CPQ implementations fail when they're built on top of broken processes rather than replacing them. Our first step was a structured audit of the entire tech stack: what was in Salesforce, what Outreach was capturing, how leads were entering the system, and where the handoffs between tools broke down.

Workflow mapping · Discovery Phase
🗂️
90-day activity data review
Analysed Salesforce opportunity history, Outreach sequence logs, and manual rep notes to identify where pipeline was stalling.
🚧
Bottleneck identification across 3 layers
Mapped breakdowns in prospecting, engagement tracking, and scoring — with estimated time cost per bottleneck per rep per week.
🗺️
Implementation roadmap delivered
Sequenced integration plan covering Apollo.io enrichment, Outreach sync configuration, Salesforce CPQ scoring rules, and Zapier automation triggers.
Phase 02
PHASE 02

Implementation & Automation — build the integrated sales engine in Salesforce

Phase 2 was the core build. We configured Salesforce Sales Cloud as the central system of record, then connected Apollo.io, Outreach, LinkedIn Sales Navigator, and Zapier around it. Apollo.io enrichment was set to run automatically on new leads entering Salesforce — pulling verified contact data, firmographics, and company intelligence into standard Salesforce fields without rep intervention.

HTML
Integrated sales engine in Salesforce
🔗
Apollo.io ↔ Salesforce integration
Automated enrichment on lead creation with deduplication rules and a single-source-of-truth data model across all connected tools.
📧
Outreach bidirectional sync configured
All sequence engagement data writes back to Salesforce activity records in real time — eliminating the manual export step for managers.
Zapier automation layer deployed
Cross-tool workflows covering enrichment triggers, sequence enrollment, Slack notifications, and task creation — reducing repetitive admin by 25–30%.
Phase 03
PHASE 03

Refinement & Enablement — optimise, train, and hand over a system that holds

The third phase is where most implementations run out of steam — the tools are live, but adoption is patchy and the scoring rules haven't been calibrated against real data yet. We ran structured enablement sessions for the sales team covering the new Outreach sequence cadences, the Salesforce lead scoring logic, and how to read the unified pipeline dashboards.

Salesforce-CPQ-Gamma
Salesforce-CPQ
🎓
Sales team enablement sessions
Role-specific training for reps and managers covering Outreach sequences, Salesforce lead routing, scoring logic, and unified reporting.
📈
Two-week post-launch KPI monitoring
Live data review and iterative refinement of sequence messaging, scoring weights, and Zapier trigger conditions based on real engagement signals.
🤝
Ongoing optimisation support
Provided strategic review calls and configuration support during the 4-week post-handover period to ensure the team was self-sufficient.

Impact & Outcomes

What Changed — In Numbers and in Practice

The metric that stuck with the client's VP of Sales wasn't the pipeline number — it was the first Monday morning meeting where the team reviewed a dashboard that showed Outreach sequence performance, Salesforce pipeline stage, and Apollo.io lead scores all in one view, without anyone spending the weekend pulling data into a spreadsheet.

35%
Pipeline growth in the first quarter following go-live, driven by faster lead identification and higher-quality outreach sequencing
30%
Faster lead identification — Apollo.io enrichment allowed reps to immediately focus on high-potential accounts rather than researching from scratch
40%
Reduction in manual lead prioritisation work — Salesforce scoring rules replaced gut-feel decisions with weighted, data-driven routing
105%
Increase in average deal size — guided selling through CPQ enabled reps to expand deals from standalone products to bundled solutions
18% increase in sequence response rates after Discovery-phase personalisation was strengthened in the post-launch refinement window
25% improvement in lead scoring accuracy — Salesforce CPQ scoring rules prioritised leads by firmographics, engagement history, and buying intent signals
25–30% reduction in repetitive admin tasks across the team — Zapier workflows eliminated manual enrichment updates, task creation, and notification steps
Unified executive reporting dashboard consolidated Salesforce, Outreach, and Apollo.io data for the first time, enabling same-day forecasting reviews
38% reduction in configuration and pricing errors via Salesforce CPQ automated rules — quote accuracy improved and customer confidence rose accordingly
28% shorter sales cycles as automated lead routing reduced follow-up delays from 24+ hours to under 2 hours for high-score inbound leads

"The tools were all there — Salesforce, Outreach, Apollo.io — but they were islands. Once we connected them properly and built scoring logic that actually matched how the team sold, the whole operation shifted from reactive to intentional. The pipeline number was the outcome, not the goal."

— Twopir Project Lead · US FinTech Sales Operations · 2025

Frequently Asked Questions

Salesforce CPQ and multi-tool integration — your questions answered

For a mid-market FinTech with 100–500 employees, a phased Salesforce CPQ implementation typically runs 8–14 weeks. This covers diagnostic audit (1–2 weeks), CPQ configuration and multi-tool integration covering Outreach, Apollo.io, and Zapier (4–6 weeks), and team enablement plus post-launch refinement (2–3 weeks). Complexity increases if the client is migrating from a heavily customised legacy CRM or integrating with a homegrown billing system.
In our FinTech engagement, integrating Apollo.io with Salesforce allowed reps to identify high-value leads 30% faster by automating enrichment and eliminating duplicate records. Combined with automated lead routing in Salesforce, the team reduced manual prioritisation work by 40% and improved lead scoring accuracy by 25%, directly contributing to a 35% pipeline increase within the first quarter post-launch.
Data fidelity between Outreach and Salesforce depends on establishing a bidirectional sync that treats Salesforce as the system of record. We configure native Outreach-Salesforce connectors to write sequence engagement data — opens, clicks, replies, meetings booked — back into Salesforce activity records in real time. The key configuration step is mapping Outreach sequence stages to Salesforce opportunity stages so that engagement signals automatically advance pipeline records.
Yes — the majority of Twopir's 500+ clients are US-based, including FinTech, SaaS, healthcare, and legal-tech companies. Our delivery team covers US EST and UK GMT time zones, with a dedicated project lead handling all client communication. Daily standups, async Slack channels, and shared Salesforce sandboxes make the collaboration feel local.
Standard Salesforce Sales Cloud includes basic opportunity and product tracking but lacks structured quoting logic. Salesforce CPQ adds rules-based product bundling, discount approval workflows, automated pricing tiers, and multi-currency support. For B2B FinTech companies with subscription models or variable pricing tiers, CPQ reduces configuration errors by 35–40% and cuts quote generation time significantly.

More From Twopir

Your sales stack has the right tools. We'll make them actually work together.

Twopir has rebuilt the Salesforce + Outreach + Apollo.io integration for 50+ US FinTech and SaaS sales teams. Free audit, prioritised findings in 5 business days, no commitment required.

Serving US · UK · Australia · UAE · Canada  ·  US EST · UK GMT · AEST coverage  ·  Response within 24 hours guaranteed