Documents are still built by hand
Someone opens last quarter's contract, saves a copy, and retypes the client name, the amounts and the dates. It works until volume rises — then it becomes the bottleneck and the source of most errors.
Buying signNow is the easy part. The value comes from what sits behind it: templates that map cleanly to your objects, routing that matches how approvals really work, and status that writes back to the record your team actually looks at. Twopir Consulting designs that layer, builds it, tests it against real data, and supports it afterwards. Templates, field mapping, routing and writeback on one architecture.
Trusted by 500+ organizations — including real estate, legal and professional-services teams running document workflows on Salesforce with Twopir Consulting.


Built for Document Operations
Almost every signNow project we are called into starts the same way: the signature part works, and everything around it is manual. The document is the symptom; the workflow is the problem.
Someone opens last quarter's contract, saves a copy, and retypes the client name, the amounts and the dates. It works until volume rises — then it becomes the bottleneck and the source of most errors.
Three offices, three contract layouts, two of them out of date with legal's current wording. Nobody can say which version a signed agreement came from, which is exactly the question that matters in a dispute.
The values already exist on the Opportunity, the Quote and the Contact. Copying them into a document by hand introduces transcription errors into the one artefact a client actually signs.
A document sits in an inbox because the routing lives in someone's head rather than in a rule. Nobody knows whether it is waiting on the client, on finance, or on a manager who is on leave.
The executed PDF ends up in an inbox or a shared drive. The Salesforce record still says "sent", reporting is wrong, and the next stage of the process starts late because nobody saw it land.
Leadership cannot answer how long a contract takes from request to signature, where it stalls, or which template produces the most rework — because none of it is captured as data.
signNow is an electronic signature and document workflow platform from airSlate. It lets organizations build reusable document templates with fillable fields, send them to one or many recipients for legally binding electronic signature, route them through a defined signing order, and keep a complete audit trail of who acted on a document, when, and from where.
For Salesforce teams the important part is the integration. signNow publishes a managed package on the Salesforce AppExchange that adds send-for-signature actions to your objects, so a document can be raised from an Opportunity, Quote, Contact or custom record without leaving the CRM. signNow also provides Apex actions for Salesforce Flow that generate a document from a DOCX template populated with live Salesforce data — including dynamic tables — and create the signing invite in the same automated run. The vendor's own reference is the signNow for Salesforce documentation.
It fits organizations whose documents are repeatable, data-driven and high-volume — lease packets, proposals, quotes, engagement letters, onboarding forms, renewals, consent and disclosure packs. It is a weaker fit where every document is individually negotiated prose with no reusable structure, or where the real requirement is contract lifecycle management with clause libraries and obligation tracking. We will tell you which of those you are, in the first conversation, before anyone writes a statement of work.
What Twopir does is separate from what signNow does. signNow provides the platform, the signature legality and the audit trail. Twopir designs the document architecture around it, builds the Salesforce integration and automation, migrates and tests it, and supports it after go-live. We implement signNow; we are not an airSlate or signNow reseller, and nothing on this page should be read as a vendor partner credential.
These are three different pieces of work with three different price tags, and mixing them up is how signNow projects overrun. Here is exactly where each one stops.
| Engagement | What it covers | Typical buyer | Where it stops |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implementation | First rollout of signNow: package install, account and role structure, template design, field mapping to your objects, signing workflows, Salesforce integration, testing, training and go-live. | Teams adopting signNow for the first time, or replacing a manual or legacy signature process. | Ends when your documented use cases run in production and your team can operate them without us. |
| Configuration & optimization | Work on an existing signNow estate: template consolidation, fixing broken field mapping, routing redesign, bulk send, reminder and expiry policy, permissions clean-up, reporting. | Organizations already live on signNow where adoption stalled or the workflow no longer matches the process. | Stays inside what signNow and Salesforce declarative tools support — no custom code is written. |
| Custom build on signNow | Development against the signNow REST API and Salesforce Apex: embedded signing inside your own application or portal, webhook listeners, custom generation logic, bulk operations, non-standard system integrations. | Product and engineering teams embedding signing into a customer-facing experience, or operations with logic the standard package cannot express. | Scoped as a development project with its own architecture, test plan and release process. |
The boundary in practice: if it can be expressed as a template, a field mapping, a role, a routing rule or a Flow, it is configuration. Once you need signing embedded in your own UI, a webhook to drive downstream systems, or generation logic that branches on data the package cannot reach, it is a build. Most engagements start as the first and only cross into the second for one or two specific requirements — we scope those separately so they stay visible.
The platform ships a large feature set. What matters is which parts your process needs and how they are configured against your data model — that is the work below.
We build DOCX templates with merge tags that populate from live Salesforce data, then trigger generation and the signing invite from a single Flow — so a document is raised from the record, not rebuilt by hand.
Template sprawl is the most common thing we find and the most expensive to leave alone. We consolidate variants into a governed set, then design the fillable field and role structure so one template serves many cases.
We turn the approval chain that currently lives in people's heads into explicit routing: who signs, in what order, what happens on decline, and when a reminder or expiry fires.
A signature that does not update the record is worth very little. We close the loop so the executed document, its audit trail and the resulting stage change all land where the business looks.
We design permissions so people can send what their role allows and nothing more, and map the platform's compliance posture against the regime you actually operate under.
When the packaged integration cannot express the requirement, we build against the signNow REST API — most often to embed signing inside a product or portal rather than send someone to email.
A signature platform only pays back when it is wired into the systems either side of it. These are the connections we design most often, and what actually moves across each one.
The core connection. Record data flows out to populate the document; signature status, the executed PDF and the audit trail flow back to the record, so pipeline stages and reporting reflect reality rather than someone's recollection.
Flow is where the business rule lives. signNow's Apex actions let a Flow generate the document and create the invite in one run, so the trigger is a record change — a stage moving, an approval landing — rather than a person remembering.
Priced line items, terms and totals move from the quote into the agreement without re-entry. When the quote is revised, the document is regenerated from current data instead of being patched by hand.
Internal approval completes in Salesforce first; only then does the external signing invite go out. This ordering stops the most damaging failure mode — a client receiving a document your own finance team has not yet accepted.
Executed documents are filed where your retention policy requires — Salesforce Files, SharePoint or a records system — with the storage location recorded against the account so nobody hunts for the signed copy later.
For anything outside the packaged path. Your application creates invites and embeds signing directly; webhooks push document and signer events back in real time so downstream systems react the moment a document completes.
Data captured at intake populates the agreement rather than being retyped into it. We commonly pair this with our FormTitan form automation work where the capture step itself needs building.
signNow is part of the airSlate portfolio, so wider document process automation can extend beyond signature. Where that is the right scope, it joins our airSlate integration services.
Six phases, one continuous engagement. A focused first use case typically reaches production in weeks rather than months; a multi-entity rollout with custom development takes longer, and we will say so during scoping rather than after.
We walk the document journey end to end — who requests it, who builds it, who approves it, who signs, what happens next — and collect every live template variant. This is where we find the twelve versions of one contract, and where the real requirements surface rather than the ones in the brief.
We decide which Salesforce objects drive which documents, where each merge value comes from, and which fields must be cleaned or added first. Data quality gets addressed here, not at testing: a merge tag pointed at an empty or inconsistent field produces a wrong document at full speed.
signNow is set up — account structure, roles, permissions — and templates are rebuilt against the agreed data model with fillable fields, validation and role assignment. Consolidating variants happens now, with the template owner in the room, because governance agreed later is governance not agreed.
The Salesforce integration is built: Flow-triggered generation and invites, routing and approval sequencing, status writeback, storage and notifications. Anything the packaged path cannot express is built against the REST API here, scoped and released as development work rather than absorbed quietly into configuration.
We test with real records, not sample data — including the awkward ones: missing fields, long values, multi-line tables, declines, expiries and re-sends. Then the people who will run it are trained on their own templates, and the template owner is trained on change control.
Release through sandbox to production with a rollback path, then a hypercare window while volume ramps. After that we track where documents stall, which templates generate rework, and where turnaround is slipping — and tune. Ongoing work can run through our Salesforce support services.
The pattern that pays back is always the same: a repeatable document, driven by data that already exists in the CRM, signed by people outside your organization.
Listing agreements, lease packets, offers and disclosure sets generated from the property and client record, routed to buyer, seller and agent in sequence. Document groups keep a multi-part packet as one transaction. See our Salesforce for real estate work.
Engagement letters and retainer agreements raised from the matter record the moment intake qualifies, so the gap between "client says yes" and "signed" stops being measured in days. Pairs with our Salesforce for law firms practice.
Priced quotes and sales agreements generated from the Opportunity with current line items, internally approved, then sent for signature — with the close date and stage updating automatically on completion.
Onboarding packets sent as a single grouped set rather than six separate emails, with each party's fields assigned by role and the whole packet tracked as one item to completion.
Renewal paperwork triggered on date-driven rules and issued through bulk invite, so a renewal cycle is a scheduled process with a tracked completion rate rather than a quarterly scramble.
Consent forms and regulatory disclosures where the audit trail is the point — who signed, when, from which address — captured as evidence rather than reconstructed from an inbox after the fact.
The gains are operational before they are financial. These are the changes clients describe first — stated as changes in how the work runs, not as percentages we cannot evidence for your business.
The preparation step largely disappears. Producing an agreement becomes an action on a record rather than a task in someone's afternoon.
Because values merge from Salesforce rather than being retyped, the agreement and the CRM agree — which removes an entire category of dispute and rework.
Every office sends the current, legal-approved wording. Template drift stops being something you discover during an audit.
Generation, routing and reminders run automatically, so the elapsed time between request and signature shortens — most visibly on documents that used to wait on one person.
Every stage is captured as data, so you can finally report on cycle time, stall points and completion rates by template, team or region.
Because the work is a configured process rather than manual effort, doubling document volume no longer implies doubling the people who handle it.
These engagements were delivered on the document-automation platforms named on each card, not on signNow — we would rather show you real, published work than imply a case study we do not have. The architecture problem is the same one a signNow project solves: getting Salesforce data into a document and the result back onto the record.
Generating client-ready documents directly from Salesforce records, with template logic and delivery handled inside the platform.
The same building blocks a signNow implementation uses: a governed template set, merge values mapped to real objects, generation triggered from the record, and output filed back where the business looks for it.
Read the Document Generation Case StudyAutomating mass billing and matter documentation across a 150-employee firm on Salesforce.
Figures are scoped to the engagements that produced them · Browse all Twopir case studies
We help growing and mid-market companies solve complex CRM, integration, and business system challenges — and we work with enterprise organizations on the same problems at greater scale.
As a Salesforce Partner with 12+ years of CRM delivery, we start with your data model. Most failed document projects are data-model problems wearing a template costume.
Our team has delivered Salesforce document automation on PDF Butler, Nintex DocGen and the airSlate platform. That breadth means we can tell you honestly when signNow is the right tool and when it is not.
With 40+ consultants and integration engineers, the same team that configures your templates can build the API work when a requirement outgrows the packaged integration.
Implementation, configuration and custom build are priced and tracked separately, so "can it also do this?" becomes a visible decision rather than an invisible overrun.
Teams in Pune and New Haven, CT, working with organizations across the US, Canada, UK, UAE, Australia and New Zealand — including the multi-entity rollouts where document rules differ by region.
Document processes change whenever the business does. Our engagement model assumes optimization after launch, not a handover and an invoice.
If signNow sits inside a wider document programme, these are the neighbouring pieces: airSlate integration services for process automation beyond signature, Nintex DocGen for Salesforce where generation is the dominant requirement, and our full Salesforce consulting services when the document problem turns out to be a CRM architecture problem. Background reading: Salesforce and airSlate integration.
Six phases: discovery of your current document journey, solution architecture against your Salesforce data model, signNow configuration and template design, integration and automation, testing and training, then deployment with ongoing support. The heaviest work is usually template consolidation and field mapping — installing the package itself takes an afternoon.
A single well-defined use case — one document type, one signing flow, one object — typically reaches production in weeks. Timelines stretch when templates need consolidating across teams, when the underlying Salesforce data needs cleaning first, or when custom API development is in scope. We give you a phased estimate after discovery, not before it, because the template count is the variable that moves everything.
It does both. signNow provides Apex actions for Salesforce Flow that generate a document from a DOCX template populated with live Salesforce data — including dynamic tables — and create the signing invite in the same automated run. That means generation and signature are one workflow rather than two tools. The design work is deciding which object drives the document and where each merge value comes from.
That is a large share of our signNow work. The usual causes are template sprawl, field mapping that broke when Salesforce changed, routing that no longer matches the approval process, or signed documents not writing back so nobody trusts the record. We run an assessment against your live configuration and rebuild the parts that are failing — normally without starting the estate over.
If the requirement can be expressed as a template, a field mapping, a role, a routing rule or a Salesforce Flow, it is configuration. Once you need signing embedded inside your own application or portal, webhooks driving downstream systems, or generation logic branching on data the packaged integration cannot reach, it is custom development against the signNow REST API. We scope and price those separately so the boundary stays visible rather than absorbing quietly into the build.
signNow documents its platform as SOC 2 Type II certified and states compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, eIDAS, PCI DSS and 21 CFR Part 11, with AES-256 encryption at rest, TLS in transit, and a per-document audit trail recording who acted, when, and from which IP address. Verify the current certification scope against the vendor's security documentation for your regime — our part is designing the permissions, retention and approval controls around it so your configuration actually meets the obligation.
It depends on where the weight of your requirement sits. signNow is a strong fit when signature and template-driven generation need to run as one workflow from Salesforce, and when per-user cost matters across a large sending population. If your dominant need is complex document generation with heavy conditional assembly, a generation-first tool such as Nintex DocGen may suit better; if it is contract lifecycle management with clause libraries and obligation tracking, neither is the right category. We are happy to say so in the first call — we implement several of these platforms and have no incentive to push one.
A first conversation is a working session, not a pitch. Bring one document type that causes the most friction — we will walk through how it would be generated, routed, signed and written back, and be straight with you about whether signNow is the right platform for it.
Speak with a team that understands Salesforce architecture, document automation & signNow delivery